January 13, 2025
4 min learn
Why Does Greenland Curiosity Trump? Local weather Change Is Solely A part of the Story
Arctic transport routes and burgeoning mining alternatives could also be a part of Greenland’s attraction to President-elect Donald Trump, however every comes with challenges as effectively
President-elect Donald Trump has been speaking covetously about Greenland, the world’s largest island, amongst different areas. “Greenland is an incredible place, and the people will benefit tremendously if, and when, it becomes part of our Nation,” he wrote on January 6 on the social media community he based, Fact Social.
The remarks got here out of the blue for a lot of Individuals—and Greenlanders as effectively, in response to Kuupik Kleist, former prime minister of the island. “We don’t really know what the background is,” he says. However science provides some hints as to Trump’s motivation—significantly whether or not it rests on potential ice soften and different outcomes of the warming local weather, a phenomenon Trump falsely denies is going on or is linked to human actions.
First, some background: Greenland is residence to fewer than 58,000 folks, about one tenth the inhabitants of Wyoming, the state with the fewest residents, or just some thousand extra folks than these within the U.S. territory of the Northern Mariana Islands. Previously a colony of Denmark, Greenland is now domestically self-governing however nonetheless underneath Danish management relating to points resembling monetary coverage, overseas affairs and safety.
On supporting science journalism
In the event you’re having fun with this text, take into account supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you’re serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world immediately.
And people points have gotten extra intricate as local weather change accelerates, making the Arctic a middle of world consideration. Greenland “is in a very strategic place in the Arctic for many different interests,” says Melody Brown Burkins, who works on science coverage and diplomacy within the Arctic and globally at Dartmouth School.
Maybe essentially the most cited facet of this strategic location comes from an unglamourous supply: worldwide transport routes. As Arctic ice melts, the argument goes, the area will turn out to be extra satisfactory to ships, providing shorter routes for transferring cargo between inhabitants facilities. And certainly, that development appears to be in movement: the variety of distinctive ships coming into the Arctic elevated by 37 p.c between 2013 and 2023, in response to the intergovernmental Arctic Council.
However the promise of polar routes could also be overhyped, Burkins says. “I think this massive idea that we’re going to send all ships to these new routes to save money is a little odd,” she says, significantly given how harsh polar ocean situations are and can proceed to be. “You can say there’s going to be less ice, but there’s going to be a lot more ice drifting around to puncture ships,” she says.
In September 2023, when Arctic sea ice was at its yearly minimal, fewer than 1,800 particular person vessels ventured into the area. That’s lower than 2 p.c of the worldwide fleet and 63 p.c of the entire yr’s Arctic ship site visitors. Furthermore, all year long, fishing ships outnumbered cargo ships. Mixed, these numbers counsel that regardless of current progress in Arctic transport, the alternatives stay restricted, as Burkins suggests. “The seasons are not conducive, and it’s very challenging waters,” she says of those northerly seas, additionally noting that transport infrastructure, such because the presence of ports, stays scarce within the area.
That restricted infrastructure additionally complicates the second narrative that has typically been cited as a purpose for curiosity in Greenland: mineral extraction, says Anne Merrild, a professor of useful resource administration at Aalborg College in Denmark, who grew up in Greenland. The minerals which are so fascinating are wealthy in uncommon earth metals and different supplies that may very well be significantly helpful in renewable power know-how resembling power-storing batteries and windmill magnets.
Merrild notes, nonetheless, that these minerals are usually not, as outsiders may assume, buried underneath Greenland’s ice sheet and frozen out of the attain of would-be miners. Loads lie alongside the ice-free coasts—however firmly underground, awaiting export infrastructure, Greenlandic political will and overseas industrial partnerships. Regardless of Trump’s feedback, Merrild says that her analysis hasn’t proven a lot U.S. industrial curiosity within the island’s minerals. Nonetheless, she and Kleist consider that underneath the proper situations, Greenlanders could be prepared to allow mining as a manner of diversifying its financial system past fishing.
“Each of these is fraught,” Burkins says of transport lanes and uncommon earth mining, in addition to different explanations for Trump’s curiosity in annexing one other authorities’s land. If nationwide safety is the priority, because the mid-Twentieth century the U.S. has had rights to function navy outposts in Greenland. Such outposts have included an notorious would-be ballistic missile web site that was deserted in 1966, produced greater than 47,000 gallons of radioactive waste and remains to be buried underneath the ice sheet, in addition to a single Area Power base working immediately.
Greenland could not typically be thought of highly effective, however it has actual political ties with each Denmark and the remainder of Europe, in addition to lengthy historic connections with Canada. Trump’s obvious curiosity within the island could even give Greenlanders extra leverage in these worldwide conversations, Merrild speculates.
And whereas Greenland and Denmark are in ongoing discussions of potential independence for the island, it’s onerous to think about Greenlanders lastly breaking ties with one colonial energy solely to voluntarily settle for one other—making Trump’s threats to make use of financial or navy pressure significantly problematic, Kleist says. “That’s far beyond acceptable,” he says. “You don’t simply do that in 2025.”