Marine scientists who made headlines final 12 months with their discovery that deep sea nodules could possibly be producing “dark oxygen” are embarking on a three-year analysis challenge to elucidate their findings.
Amid swirling controversy over their analysis, challenge lead Andrew Sweetman on the Scottish Affiliation for Marine Science says he hopes the brand new scheme will “show once and for all” that metallic lumps of rock are sources of deep sea oxygen and begin to clarify how the method is working. “We know that it’s going on, and what we need to now do is show it again, and then really start getting at the mechanism,” he says.
Sweetman had spent greater than a decade learning life on the ocean ground earlier than his shock discovery made headlines in July final 12 months, and confounded the analysis group. Beforehand, it was thought that oxygen manufacturing relied on the presence of crops, algae or cyanobacteria to carry out photosynthesis, powered by daylight.
However Sweetman’s workforce discovered rising oxygen ranges on nodule-rich areas of sea ground, 1000’s of metres under the ocean floor the place no gentle can penetrate and no crops develop. The researchers instructed that the nodules could possibly be appearing as “geobatteries”, producing an electrical present that splits water molecules into hydrogen and “dark” oxygen, produced naturally with out photosynthesis.
Sweetman discovered himself on the centre of a media storm. Life modified in a single day, he says – he even will get stopped on the road by folks wanting {a photograph} with him. “It’s been very surreal,” he says.
However the discovery additionally introduced challenges. The analysis has attracted criticism from some scientists and deep-sea mining firms, who plan to mine the nodules for valuable supplies wanted for the inexperienced power transition.
The Metals Firm (TMC), which funded a few of the analysis that led to Sweetman’s 2024 paper, has been among the many fiercest critics of his findings. Its scientists have printed a paper arguing the invention is “completely unsupported” by proof and elevating considerations in regards to the research’s methodology.
They are saying defective gear or misuse of the landers may have produced uncommon readings, claiming that different researchers utilizing related procedures haven’t been in a position to replicate the findings. In addition they increase questions relating to the info utilized in Sweetman’s research, claiming the analysis depends on flawed and inappropriate knowledge.
“After decades of research using the same methods, no credible scientist has ever reported evidence of ‘dark oxygen’,” Gerard Barron, the CEO and chairman of The Metals Firm, mentioned in a press release. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We’re still waiting.”
Considerations have additionally been raised with the journal that printed Sweetman’s research, Nature Geoscience. “We have been looking into [these concerns] carefully following an established process. However, a decision as to what action may be taken, if any, has not been made at this time,” a spokesperson for the journal advised New Scientist.
Sweetman insists his research is correct and he might be responding to TMC’s criticisms in a proper rebuttal to their paper. However he says his expertise on the centre of the controversy has been “extremely tiring” and upsetting. “There’s been lots of discussion. A lot of mining companies have been saying lots of different things, a lot of it not so nice, which has been a challenge to live through,” he says. “It’s definitely had a bit of an impact on me. The online bullying hasn’t been nice to be exposed to, and it has been continuous.”
Sweetman’s new analysis challenge, funded by way of a £2 million grant from Japanese charity The Nippon Basis, goals to put a few of the controversy to relaxation. Sweetman’s workforce will use model new, custom-built landers able to descending to 12,000 metres under sea stage, twice the depth reached by the earlier research, to hunt particularly for darkish oxygen manufacturing within the Pacific Ocean.
The primary of three analysis expeditions will set sail in January 2026 from San Diego, California, with the goal of confirming nodule-driven oxygen manufacturing within the deep ocean with contemporary knowledge. As soon as once more, the landers will seal off samples of water and sediment from the ocean ground to measure modifications in oxygen concentrations. The researchers may also take a look at for the presence of hydrogen, which might even be produced if seawater electrolysis is happening. And they’re going to inject isotopically labelled water into samples to hint any chemical modifications to the weather.
Sweetman is bullish in regards to the prospects of discovering darkish oxygen manufacturing. “I know it’s happening. We have found this now in six places. I know we are going to find it,” he says.
An additional two expeditions will search to analyze what microbial or electrochemical mechanisms could also be at play, and begin to discover the potential contribution of darkish oxygen manufacturing in deep ocean ecosystems. It’s the first analysis of its sort to immediately discover these processes – Sweetman’s preliminary discovery was, by his personal admission, “serendipitous”. “I didn’t set out to show this; we just set out to measure sea floor respiration,” he says of his preliminary work.
NASA can also be all for learning the nodules, Sweetman says, to analyze whether or not related processes could possibly be supporting life on different moons and planets.
Deep-sea mining corporations might be watching the challenge carefully. They’re hoping to begin operations later this 12 months, however are nonetheless ready for the Worldwide Seabed Authority to finalise its guidelines on deep sea mining. Extra proof of deep sea oxygen manufacturing would deal a extreme blow to their hopes of building a mining trade on the ocean ground.
Sweetman says corporations ought to maintain off mining the seabed till scientists know extra in regards to the potential function of darkish oxygen manufacturing in ocean ecosystems. “All we are asking for is a little more time to go out and try to figure out what is going on,” he says.
Subjects: