Cat or canine individual?
Leah Michelle Baines and Jessica Lee Oliva at James Cook dinner College in Australia say they’ve found that individuals who personal canines are typically extra resilient than those that personal cats. Additionally they report discovering that individuals who personal cats are typically extra neurotic than those that personal canines.
Writing in Anthrozoös, they are saying: “In contrast to our expectations, no other personality differences were found between pet owners…Findings suggest that personality factors might explain why people who choose to own dogs fare better than people who choose not to own dogs during challenging times of social isolation, which may be unrelated to the animal itself.”
Sizing up satisfaction
A lot of science will depend on the query “how can I measure this thing (whatever this thing is) accurately, precisely and reliably enough to gain insight about it”. That query nearly screams – perhaps in ecstasy, perhaps in agony, perhaps in puzzlement – from a analysis paper that reader Nicolas Clairis dropped at Suggestions’s consideration.
“Do sex toys make me satisfied? The use of sex toys in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, France, and the UK” was printed by Gert Martin Hald, Silvia Pavan and Camilla S. Øverup in The Journal of Intercourse Analysis.
How, Suggestions has stayed up nights questioning, might one measure that type of satisfaction in somebody aside from oneself? Measure it in a manner that may make one really feel assured that the reply is correct and true?
Apparently unafraid of the issue, Hald, Pavan and Øverup went at it. They went at it greater than a thousandfold. Greater than 10 occasions a thousandfold. They sought measurements of a kind from “11,944 respondents from six European countries”.
Suggestions hesitates to enter element right here about how the crew obtained and interpreted the 11,944 solutions. If the temptation is an excessive amount of for you to withstand, go learn the paper. Inform us whether or not you discover its climactic conclusion to be satisfying.
Espresso controversy
Nothing will get kidneys pumping fairly the best way espresso does — and nothing will get the hearts and minds of kidney researchers pumping fairly the best way the kidneys/espresso query does. Kidney Worldwide Studies typically treats its readers to boluses of opinion and truth about this, from researchers who appear emotionally primed and pumped.
A two-part query drives this motion: precisely how, and precisely how a lot, does espresso get kidneys pumping? A back-and-forth between two teams of US researchers started with the publication of “Coffee consumption may mitigate the risk for acute kidney injury“. Its authors say that “higher coffee intake was associated with a lower risk” of kidney issues.
The crew checked out information collected throughout a three-year span, wherein 15,792 middle-aged folks indicated what number of cups of espresso they thought that they had swallowed throughout the earlier 12 months – thus, 15,792 self-educated guesses. The examine compares these guessed coffee-cup tallies with every individual’s file, in later life, of what it calls “acute kidney injury events”, or AKIs.
A second group responded by pumping out a letter known as “The lacking hyperlink between espresso consumption and AKI-water“. The drinks, or the failure to drink, can have overwhelming results on the kidneys, the researchers counsel. Additionally they counsel that the primary group might not have absolutely thought of that.
The primary group disagreed, and pumped again a well-maybe-but-Killer response, citing a examine about espresso and dehydration. That British examine’s lead creator: Sophie Killer.
Onward forth, and onward again, sloshes the dialogue. Extra lately, a 3rd group based mostly in China, South Korea and the Czech Republic introduced the movement of opinion once more into its conventional middle-ground muddle. “In summary,” says the crew’s report, “several contradictory effects of caffeine intake on kidney function have been reported”.
Espresso to stop covid-19
Espresso-drinking can have nearly any desired medical impact on an individual, to some extent. In some circumstances, that diploma is zero. In different circumstances, it’s not.
Chen-Shiou Wu at China Medical College in Taiwan and colleagues ran experiments that led them to publish a examine known as “Espresso as a dietary technique to stop SARS-CoV-2 an infection“.
Their first experiment requested if espresso might impede the SARS-CoV-2 virus from infecting human embryonic kidney cells nurtured in a lab. Then they drew and did experiments on blood from 64 espresso drinkers. The cell work and the drinker work, mixed, led to some optimistic recommendations.
The crew stories that the perfect timeline for espresso to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 an infection is inside 6 hours. “Taken together,” they are saying, “drinking 1–2 cups of coffee [or even] decaffeinated coffee daily can potently reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection including wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron variants.” These likelihoods “can serve as a guideline for dietary health during coexistence with SARS-CoV-2”.
At most, this might be the efficient, easy therapy that everybody has been in search of. No less than, espresso is as efficacious in opposition to covid-19 as it’s in opposition to most different illnesses.
Marc Abrahams created the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony and co-founded the journal Annals of Inconceivable Analysis. Earlier, he labored on uncommon methods to make use of computer systems. His web site is inconceivable.com
Received a narrative for Suggestions?
You possibly can ship tales to Suggestions by e-mail at suggestions@newscientist.com. Please embrace your property deal with. This week’s and previous Feedbacks could be seen on our web site.
