International carbon pricing wanted to avert commerce friction, says WTO chief

Unlock the Editor’s Digest without cost

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.

International carbon pricing is required to stop “difficult and problematic” disputes over environmental measures from disrupting commerce, the top of the World Commerce Group has mentioned.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala informed the Monetary Occasions in an interview that the WTO was taking the lead in working for a world carbon pricing system with the IMF, OECD and UN. 

That effort is available in response to the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism, which got here into pressure this 12 months and requires exporters to the commerce bloc to pay a levy linked to the EU carbon value for the emissions of sure carbon-intensive merchandise together with metal, cement and fertiliser.

The measure, which comes into pressure in 2026, is supposed to degree the taking part in discipline between EU producers, who need to pay for emissions beneath the bloc’s cap-and-trade system, and exporters in nations with decrease or no carbon costs.

It’s anticipated to set off a slew of complaints on the WTO from buying and selling companions.

India has already hinted it may deliver a WTO case, whereas different growing nations have mentioned the measure would value their items out of EU markets.

“Developing countries see it, rightly or wrongly, as a protectionist mechanism,” the WTO director-general mentioned. “They have contributed very little to emissions. Africa is 3 per cent of [current] global emissions.” 

The EU has defended the measure and emphasised that it has despatched officers world wide to assist nations together with China to develop their very own carbon markets.

In a doc outlining political priorities for the subsequent five-year mandate of the European Fee, its president Ursula von der Leyen mentioned the bloc should “step up our green diplomacy and engage more with non-EU countries on external aspects of our policies”.

Okonjo-Iweala mentioned the EU was proper to attempt to deal with local weather change however its strategy may fragment environment friendly commerce routes at the price of financial development.

“We see [litigation] coming. We think it will be quite difficult and problematic. So we’re trying to avoid that by saying why don’t we develop a global framework that is interoperable? So that we can limit the trade litigation frictions that would come here.”

The Nigerian mentioned there have been 78 completely different carbon pricing and taxation mechanisms on this planet.

The intention of the working group was to discover a strategy to set completely different carbon costs in numerous areas. The EU would possibly pay $80 a tonne, and Africa $20. 

This may require a change to CBAM, which levies the distinction between the EU carbon value and that paid by the supply of the imports to the bloc.

The proposed international system would additionally want safeguards towards carbon arbitrage, the place heavy emitters merely transfer to areas with decrease costs, Okonjo-Iweala mentioned.

Okonjo-Iweala, who has been nominated for a second time period on the WTO by African nations, mentioned she needed commerce to assist scale back carbon emissions.  

“I’m really personally so excited about it because I think there’s really potential for trade to do more, for trade to be part of the answer. ”

When she began in 2021 “trade was seen as part of the problem” due to transport emissions and commodities exported from deforested land. “I really wanted to turn that around.”

She mentioned she had inspired nations signed as much as a world procurement settlement to prioritise inexperienced buying. There are additionally WTO talks over a world environmental items settlement that will drop tariffs on many gadgets equivalent to photo voltaic panels. Nevertheless, the US particularly has been elevating tariffs to foster a home business to compete with China.

Okonjo-Iweala mentioned nations ought to reroute environmentally damaging subsidies in the direction of sustainable business. There are $1.2tn of annual fossil gasoline subsidies, $600bn of trade-distorting agricultural subsidies, $300bn of water subsidies and $22bn of dangerous fisheries subsidies, she mentioned.

Her time period expires subsequent 12 months, however she is predicted to make an announcement on Monday about whether or not she is going to run for a second time period.

Okonjo-Iweala may very well be confirmed after a month if no rival emerges, which might stop a re-elected Donald Trump from blocking her, as he did in 2020. He left workplace in January 2021, permitting her to take the job.

Further reporting by Alice Hancock in Brussels